Town not listening, newspaper failing to hold those in power accountable

To the Editor:

A few weeks ago this newspaper exhorted the citizens to be more participative in town affairs. Well, I’m trying, and it’s been a real education.

The town makes it difficult to participate. The website is confusing. Contact information for many employees and appointees is missing or hard to find. The instructions for how to provide your views on issues are...wait, there are no instructions. For example it is not clear when public comment is allowed.

And questions from the public are never allowed. That’s right. We are not allowed to ask questions of our politically appointed representatives.

Take for example our Parks & Recreation Commission. In their 10/16 public meeting they only failed to cover one agenda item—Public Comment. Any NFL coach would have been impressed to see the chair run out the clock by talking about scheduling matters and dog excrement. No time for their neighbors to express their concerns on how Parks & Rec will be spending over $2.5 million to commercialize Pear Tree Point Beach.

The last 20 minutes were particularly impressive—I hope TV79 captured it all. The chairman’s reference to the proceedings as “my meeting” particularly elicited some real time feedback from her neighbors.

This paper may be discouraged to hear that your survey on Pear Tree Point Beach is not relevant to the Parks & Rec Commission. Per the chairman, only emails sent directly to the chairman or the director are taken into account. Well, at least now we know.

And I am increasingly disappointed in how this newspaper conforms to the town hall party line and does little to perform the historic function of the Fourth Estate—hold power accountable. Could it be that editorial is held hostage to the advertising revenue from the town?

H P Boyle


Privately commissioned study shows growing risk of flooding at Pear Tree Point Beach

To the Editor:

With its proposal for Pear Tree Point Beach, Darien has strayed far from the stated goals and priorities of the Master Plan to include a year-round rental facility, a category that didn’t even make it into the 32 Highest Priorities for additional/expanded services. Even more troubling is the committee’s disregard for the location it plans to build on. The town admits that PTPB is in a FEMA-designated flood zone, but only to reveal its cleverness in skirting the law: rather than renovate the existing building and be held to FEMA imposed monetary construction limits, it proposes to build a brand new building where the budgetary sky is the limit(!) But, surely, there is a point to FEMA’s designations. What about the real costs, both up front and long term, of building and maintaining in a flood zone?

Such questions inspired me to order a study of PTPB from a private company that helps people determine flood risks for insurance. (The PTPB Committee has not thus far ordered any studies to determine flooding feasibility, not for today and not for 10, 15, 30 years from today. Instead, one member chose to look backwards, opining somewhat giddily at the last meeting that the beach is not much changed in shape since 1934.) According to my study, PTPB has a high and growing risk for tidal inundations on any given day of the year and is vulnerable to storm surge heights and inundation levels of 19.3’ and nearly 18’ respectively during a Category 3 hurricane. The increasing frequency of flooding in the parking lot is not the result of a clogged drain, the town’s unproven culprit for water spilling across the asphalt, but of rising seas. I ask: Would you spend your own dollars on a multi-million-dollar facility that will surely flood regularly at the lower level and that risks flooding at the upper level during future big storms?

Darien should not proceed with its unpopular, shortsighted, and fiscally irresponsible plan to spend tax-payer funds on an expensive two-story luxury building in the middle of a flood zone.

Lisa M. Ryan-Boyle


Pear Tree Point Beach project reminiscent of ‘Shuffle’ in 2011

To the Editor:

As our elected leaders consider the substantial voter opposition to the proposal to build an expensive, environmentally unsound structure at Pear Tree Point Beach, it’s important to reflect on an earlier controversial and costly proposal, the “Darien Shuffle” project of 2011. This went ahead despite a majority of voters in a town referendum rejecting the plan. In the end, it resulted in huge overruns above the projected cost presented to voters.

A total of 4,009 votes were cast in the Shuffle Referendum in December, 2011. Of those, 2,445 voters cast ballots against the shuffle project, a substantial majority (61%) of votes cast. However, under the rules of the referendum, 3,112 votes against the shuffle were needed in order to overturn it.

First Selectman Jayme Stevenson, who was a major supporter of the shuffle, said she was pleased by the result of the referendum. “I had tremendous faith in the voters of Darien,” she said at the time. “Common sense and compassion won the day.”

This stuck me as an odd observation when the clear majority of votes cast were against the project, but it is a reminder as we consider Pear Tree Point that voter engagement is a must even when a project has so much opposition — a point that the Darien Times made in its editorial urging citizen participation. However when the opposition is so strong, as shown in the Darien Times poll, it’s reasonable to expect that this should be enough to persuade town leaders to kill the project.

The shuffle was a fiasco. The contractor and the performance bond company both went bankrupt. The town paid the contractor for his subs, but he didn’t pay them. After the bankruptcy, the town had to pay the subs again. The ‘winning” contractor was far below the other bidders. This should have been a red flag but it helped shuffle backers sell the project.

The huge cost overruns on the shuffle should be a lesson of what happens when an unpopular project is rammed through by claiming unrealistic costs.

Charles Salmans


Problems with beach project are based on common sense

To the Editor:

We wanted to start by making one thing clear: We love the energy Pear Tree Point Beach brings to the neighborhood. The constant stream of activity underlines the reason we love the beach. Whether it’s taking in the natural beauty, boating, or just enjoying the sand with family—residents enjoy common interests in a special setting, exactly what you want in a tight knit community. Our kids have even earned money and learned some solid life lessons by setting up lemonade stands for the many passersby. In short, we welcome the visitors and the pulse they bring.

Our issues with the proposed renovations have nothing to do with—as some town officials have intimated—our reluctance to “share” the beach with others. Instead, our issues are based on common sense:

 Spending $3 million on a covered community space the town doesn’t want or need makes no sense.

 Spending $3 million to massively upgrade a structure that sits in a known flood zone makes no sense.

 Spending $3 million given the fiscal condition of the state and town makes no sense.

 Spending $3 million and losing 45 spots in an already-crowded parking lot makes no sense.

 Spending $3 million but doing so by using a “50% loophole” in FEMA standards makes no sense.

 Spending $3 million despite the clear, constant, and widespread opposition makes no sense.

On the other hand, it makes perfect sense to renovate the existing structure and upgrade the beach to improve its sustainability. It seems the Darien Parks and Recreation Department is acting more like the Darien Parks and “Re-creation” Department. Pear Tree Point Beach needs a facelift, not a three million-dollar lobotomy.

Adam and Laurie Duarte


Pear Tree Point Beach cannot afford to lose 45 parking spots

To the Editor:

The latest plans posted on the Parks and Rec Website indicate a scheme to remove 45 parking spaces in conjunction with “improvements” to Pear Tree Point Beach. On a nice summer holiday weekend with many beach goers and boaters heading to Pear Tree Point, the parking is already tight if not completely sold out. How can we afford to lose 45 of those precious parking spots?There has to be a way to keep these 45 spots and even to INCREASE the amount of parking down at Pear Tree Point.

Tom Lochtefeld


Parks & Rec meeting filibustered out public comment on Oct. 16

To the Editor:

I am compelled to write a note after my experience attending a Darien Parks and Recreation Commission meeting on Oct. 16, 2019.

After circular discussions on the other agenda items, the event that most of the public in attendance had been waiting for arrived: a review from Neil Hauk and Dan Biggs on the Pear Tree Point Beach renovation project. The plans were reviewed with few questions and the Commission moved on.

10:17 p.m. — the Commission was chatting, planning upcoming events, discussing the meeting schedule for 2020, and mentioning as a reminder that everyone needed to be out of the room by 10:30 p.m. Needless to say, the bleary-eyed observers were outraged. Attendees had waited three hours to say their piece only to be filibustered out of that opportunity.

The air of contention present at every PTPB meeting is unfortunate, but after attending numerous meetings, I have come to understand why we must now deal with the “us versus them” attitude on both sides. Parks & Rec as well as the PTPB Building Committee have not listened to the public’s comments and lack of support for this project.

The sense of superiority emanating from certain members of the Committee is infuriating. The public articulates they do not like the proposed plans but have to watch, silently, as it is pushed through by P&C and the PTPB Building Committee. Additionally, their comments and questions are tossed aside or glossed over with a purposeful vagueness.

One member of the Committee requested that a plan be drawn up to see what the possibilities would be to renovate the existing structure, a compromise monetarily and aesthetically. The Committee co-chairs and secretary shut down the request, stating it was unfair to Neil Hauck, after doing so much work, to ask him to draw up another option.

There are more details that are important for the overall understanding of what is at play here, too many to enumerate in this letter, so visit: to learn more. Also reference a Facebook survey being conducted by the Darien Times- I personally found the comments very engaging.

Danielle Dixon


Parks & Rec Commissioner says public’s feedback has resulted in plan adjustments

To the Editor:

I have served on the Parks and Recreation Commission for over 12 years. At last week’s meeting, the feedback session for the Pear Tree Point Beach renovation fell victim to a packed agenda, so I wanted to provide the following information in another forum (note that I don’t presume to speak for any of my fellow Commissioners).

Regarding feedback on Pear Tree, we are continually in a listening mode. The Pear Tree Beach Building Committee has already responded to resident comments and made numerous revisions to the plan, including:

 Removing several access ramps,

 Not employing berms and keeping head-in parking with harbor views,

 Eliminating the proposed boardwalk on the jetties,

 Proposing a two-story building with a lower, inclined slope to comply with FEMA regulations and to keep the foot print and sight lines as close to the original building as possible,

 Keeping the bathrooms at ground level, and

 Reducing the size of the Flexible Community Program Space.

The Committee also clarified that rental of the space (1) would only be during the off-season, (2) would only be available to Darien organizations and residents, and (3) would end no later than 10 p.m. An attendant will also be on duty during all rentals.

We received a number of traffic safety concerns, but what is surprising is that most of those concerns were about today’s situation on Pear Tree Point — I am going to propose that we work with the Police Department to actually assess the traffic situation and propose solutions.

We also heard comments about managing overflow parking for large events at the beach —I will be sure that improving this will be on our future agenda.

I do think that this could be another transformative project for the town, like Weed Beach was. The finished project will result in a bathhouse with space that is beautiful and accessible for all ages and challenges, a boat launch ramp that is actually usable, and a parking lot that will alleviate drainage issues. Weed Beach’s biggest doubters are now among its heaviest users, and we hope and expect that the same will be true for Pear Tree Point Beach.

Full details about the project are available at the Park and Recreation website:

Susan Daly


Darien Park and Recreation Commission

Don’t turn Pear Tree Point Beach into Jersey Shore

To the Editor:

As a long time resident of Darien and frequent visitor to Pear Tree Point Beach, I’d like to express my opposition to the proposed construction project.

In a few words, not every resident of Darien wants to turn our beaches into entertainment venues like the Jersey Shore. Weed beach has already been “updated” to accommodate people who like excessive construction in naturally beautiful spaces, why can’t we leave Pear Tree point alone for the rest of us?

Pear Tree Point beach offers a serene natural space which meets the needs of many residents who want to get away from the hustle and bustle of living in a high stress suburb of NYC. To add a two-story building to that space, no matter how attractive the structure may be, would be a blight on the neighborhood.

Some people suggest that an elevator to the gazebo would be nice, I think the gazebo is a blotch on an otherwise attractive landscape and should be torn down. My suggestion would be to maintain the building that is already there, possibly even remove the restaurant section of it leaving only the bathrooms and showers to keep the beach clean and tearing down the gazebo, leaving the natural rock. This would certainly be the most cost effective solution.

I support repairing and updating the existing structure. I am wholeheartedly opposed to wasting 2 million dollars on a two-story structure. The beach regularly floods, so it’s a fools errand to build there. Decking or other walkways that accommodate handicapped individuals could easily be added from the parking lot to the picnic area without mangling the natural character of the beach. Tearing down the gazebo would eliminate the need for accessibility and would restore the view in that area. Residents who desire a more commercial atmosphere can go to Weed Beach.

Thanks for your time.

Deborah Furletti


Project is aesthically and financially a bad decision

The following letter was sent to the Representative Town Meeting. It is reprinted here at the author’s request.

To the Editor:

I do not live near Pear Tree Beach, but I go there frequently to enjoy the view. I find it incomprehensible that the Town is thinking of putting a multistory building atop the rocks that gently grace the shoreline. The area floods with every full moon!

The current view is beautiful and reminiscent of Maine, with the iconic gazebos on both shores. From the drawings, the proposed new structure will make Pear Tree look like Rockaway Beach, or worse yet, a Nazi-era bunker on the North Sea.

Equally important is the incomprehensible notion that the Town’s leaders feel no guilt in paying for the structure, regardless of cost, with new debt. Are the members of the RTM and the Town’s public employees unaware that Connecticut is #49 out of the 50 states in unfunded liabilities? Additional debt for such an unnecessary project reflects tremendous lack of any sense of fiduciary responsibility. Property values in Connecticut have been falling for 12 years. Why? High property taxes! And the RTM and those responsible at Town Hall want to incur more debt for this unwanted facility?

This project has the smell of being nefariously promoted so that someone on the committee can award the contract for all the catering to a relative. Really bad public spending usually has equally bad reasoning behind it. There is no chance that event revenues can come anywhere close to servicing the debt. Residents will have to pay for this folly.

Darien historically was known as a community with smart financial oversight. Property values reflected that prudence. The past 12 years of freefalling residential real estate values indicate that those in charge of the public spending in the State, including Darien officials, are “off the rails.” Our leadership has lost all sense of Yankee values.

Schuyler Winter


Start listening to people who live in Darien and love the beach

To the Editor:

I do not live near or around Pear Tree Point Beach, but I do use it on a daily basis. I started the protest against the berms and sand dunes to get the towns attention, now that we have it, the town has the nerve to insist it’s just the neighbors who do not want it, factually untrue! We have collected over 700 signatures of people from around town who are opposed to the project.

We have shown up to the meetings, we have voiced our opinions, we have talk to others, we have research, but you choose to ignore us all, instead you sight looking to the future, the new peoples who will be renting apartments, who will need open space, who don’t pay taxes! I have personally been to every meeting since November and have witness the numbers of people who have gotten involved and are concerned about PTPB! Start listening to the people who live here, love it here and use the beach! It’s pretty obvious that you all have an agenda, and the voice of the people don’t count! There is a word compromise, maybe you should consider doing some of the projects but not all of them! We all want updated bathrooms, the boat ramp, the picnic area, the parking lot, even the concession, but a $2.5 million flexible space, that we never asked for or wanted is too much!

Kelli Kole


Don’t ruin the gem of an untouched beach

To the Editor:

I’m a long time Darien resident, and have been going to the beaches here for 30 years. My children grew up going to both, and while the renovations at Weed are lovely, and the facilities are wonderful, Pear Tree is perfect as it is. It’s an untouched gem, exactly what a beach should be - sand, water, views.

The Town of Darien should be fiscally responsible and not spend taxpayer dollars on yet another project we don’t need and residents haven’t clamored for. There is a renovated beach in town for those residents who want upgraded bathrooms, concessions, tennis, paddle or playgrounds. Pear Tree is small, floods and doesn’t need a year round rental space. The dollars you are planning on spending to do this come out of our pockets. We should be putting money into things that are necessary, not frivolous. Necessities, not niceties.

Please don’t ruin this gem of an untouched beach by renovating it and turning it into yet another over the top project.

We don’t need it and can’t afford it.

Marianne Lauer


Opposition to the beach project is beyond neighborhood

The following letter was sent to the Parks & Rec Department, commission and Pear Tree Point Beach Building Committee. It is reprinted here at the author’s request.

To the Editor:

My name is Andrea McCracken. I have lived with my husband, Craig, in Darien since 2007. We had raised our family here now for over 10 years. Like many, we moved here from New York City, my hometown. We were actually looking to move to New Canaan and we looked at many, many homes back then; however, one drive over the Ring’s End Bridge, around Pear Tree Point Beach and up Long Neck Point Road changed our minds and —well —here we are!

We remember how much we loved the area when we came here —especially the beach. We would often take our children there when they were little and we enjoyed sitting and having lunch at the gazebo. We often played in the water and marveled at the small fish, crabs and birds all around us. Our memories of the beach are quiet and beautiful. The gazebo is a hallmark for our family and it tells us we are home. We hope that future generations will be able to use the beach in much the same way.

We have kept up to date with all of the happenings around the development of the beach. It is hard to understand how so much planning happened without —at least —our neighborhood being a part of the discussion. We have heard on many occasions that the Town of Darien feels that the complaints are limited to a very small number of neighbors. Let us be very clear — that is not a true statement. We have yet to meet one person from town, whether they live around the beach or far off in other areas of North Darien, who believes that this development is a good idea for many reasons. Please do not disregard what the Darien taxpayers are telling you.

A restaurant style development and party space will bring many cars and people to a residential area. Please note that the traffic during the summer is already quite heavy and many drivers speed around our small roads and it is a hazard for children and adults alike. This type of facility at our beach will also create a significant amount of waste. Darien Animal Control is a frequent visitor to the beach even now trying to get racoons and other vermin out of the garbages and surrounding spaces. The noise such a facility will create is also something that should be considered. Homes are directly on the beach here — unlike Weed Beach where there is space between the common areas and the home owners. The noise in the summer time is significant and certainly an increase would be overbearing to those in the direct vicinity. Also, such a large structure would just be an eyesore. The gazebo should be left alone and a two story structure should not be built as it will only disrupt the views and tranquility of our beach.

The flooding at the beach is real and it occurs daily —even when there are no storms or significant weather patterns. (We hope you have seen the daily pictures that are posted on Just as an example, the small guard house has rotting from all of the water that comes up through the parking lot and onto Pear Tree Point Road regularly. When the tides are high, there is enough water that would prohibit visitors from parking or even wading through the parking lot in bare feet.

Two and half million is a lot of money. Let’s not forget it is taxpayer money and the taxpayers of this town are clearly telling you that developing this beach is NOT what we want. We firmly believe there are many other projects that residents would welcome —and would make sense for all of the community. As parents and residents, my husband and I often talk about why people have such a need to develop every nook and cranny around them. Some things are truly better left in their natural state.

Andrea & Craig McCracken


Senior citizen prizes beach charm, says minimal updating would suffice

To the Editor:

As a senior citizen, Pear Tree Beach was one of the reasons we selected Darien. We greatly enjoy its peaceful New England charm. But the town’s plan to redevelop Pear Tree Beach would demolish the current buildings, construct a two-story structure containing a second floor rental/community space, remove the changing rooms, plant vegetation between the parking space and the beach, and reduce the number of parking spaces.

Instead, I support renovating the existing buildings and barbecue area, retaining the current number of parking spaces, and replacing the missing trees along the waterfront, and not planting vegetation along the beach.

Andrew C. Millar


RTM District IV

Fed has warned against building in a flood zone

To the Editor:

As the town continues to shrug off overwhelming public opposition against its building program at Pear Tree Point Beach perhaps the Board of Finance will take note of the Federal Reserve. Last week, the Federal Reserve Bank warned against developing in flood prone areas. Let’s hope they demonstrate more common sense than the Parks and Recreation Commission.

Jim Errington


Voices that oppose beach project are being silenced

To the Editor:

I am strongly opposed to the proposed plans for Pear Tree Point Beach. I am not a neighbor of this beach and the proposed restructure/rebuild plan is not looked upon favorably by residents town wide. I also did not know anyone on these committees prior to the last two meetings that I attended. I moved to Darien (1965) as a teenager and still reside here now as a senior citizen. Pear Tree has always been my beach of choice.

Most disturbing is the fact that the voices of Darien’s residents in opposition to the plan are silenced. It seems that anyone not in favor of the proposed plan is a nuisance to the Parks and Recreation Department and town government. It is a shame that so few make long lasting decisions for so many.

The editorial in the Darien Times was correct in the use of the word “compromise.” Updates and repairs are needed but the proposed plan is unacceptable. Pear Tree needs to remain the simple, serene beach that it is.

Preserve Pear Tree Point.

Bette Hartmayer


Depot’s SADD chapter grateful for community support for mental health awareness fair

To the Editor:

We would first like to thank Editor Susan Shultz for the amazing job done by The Darien Times covering community events and news in Darien. You have been doing a great job for many years, congratulations!

On behalf of SADD (Students Against Destructive Decisions), Darien Domestic Abuse Council and Respect Works, we would like to thank everyone that attended and participated in our Community Mental Health Awareness Fair/ Family Fun Day recently. Thank you Hindley School, for giving us permission to use the grounds. We would publicly like to thank the organizations that helped us to make the day so special; Darien Police Department, Darien Arts Center, Noroton Heights Stop and Shop, Noroton Fire Department, Town of Darien — Department of Public Works, Post 53, The Renfrew Center, The Rowan Center, Liberation Programs, At Home In Darien, Parent Awareness, Kids In Crisis, American Automobile Assn., Giovanni’s at Water’s Edge, Michael Joseph Catering, Waveny LifeCare Network, The HUB, Communities 4 Action, Silver Hill Hospital, Fresh Green Light Driving School, Tim Simpson Hauling, and The Laurel House. A big thank you to the Depot Volunteer Club for all your help. Thank you Sandra Fox, for taking the time to go to each table, ask questions, and write such a great, informative article.

Thank you to State Representative Terrie Wood and First Selectman Jayme Stevenson for taking the time to attend. Thank you to The Darien Police Association for sponsoring the Bouncy House Obstacle Course. A BIG thank you to HRTM Consulting (Kronos Certified Partner) for sponsoring the band, TRIBAL LEGACY, which had everyone on their feet dancing and singing.

Sage Gupta & Kaitlyn Olvany, Co-Presidents of SADD

Catie Duggan, Charlotte Sulger & Maddie Joyce, Co-Presidents of Respect Works

Thank you to the newspaper and school district for swastika response

To the Editor:

Thank you to the editor for follow up on the story concerning anti-Semitic episodes at Middlesex Middle School and to Superintendent Addley for instituting programs relating to diversity and respect.

Among the benefits of a fine public education is the opportunity for students to interact with all of the members of their community and to cultivate empathy for others in their sphere and beyond.

Leslie Smith Rousell




Former Board of Ed colleague endorses Reilly for Planning & Zoning

To the Editor:

I am delighted to support George Reilly for Darien Planning and Zoning Commission. After 35 years of practicing law and active participation in various community organizations including Darien Board of Selectman, Norwalk Community College Foundation, King School Board of Trustees, and Center for Hope, George understands this town.

He and I were colleagues for most of his nine-year tenure on the Board of Education. When considering new programs, facilities and budgets, George was a staunch advocate for all students. He did his homework, offered intelligent and insightful comments and based on his decisions on solid analysis. He was inclusive and considerate of differing opinions as we deliberated potentially contentious topics. George Reilly was an asset to the BOE and will undoubtedly be an asset to P&Z. He is exceptionally well suited to guide Darien’s future development. Please join me in casting your vote for him on Nov. 5.

Heather L. Shea


Koons has been a valued selectman

To the Editor:

I am writing this letter to support Kip Koons for Selectman. Kip has consistently volunteered his time to make Darien a great place to live. Kip is a person of integrity and has quietly made significant contributions to the Town.

Kip was a member of the Building Committee for the town garage renovation. This was a $6 million project that was delivered one month early and ~9% under budget. He assisted our First Selectman in the negotiations for the Town’s purchase of 16 acres from the Ox Ridge Hunt Club. He now serves as Co-Chairman of the Building Committee for a new Ox Ridge Elementary School which includes the consolidation of district-wide ELP students into the new facility. Kip has been instrumental in keeping taxes low, increasing the quality of our infrastructure and proposing sound budgets.

Please join me in casting a vote for Kip and our Republican selectmen candidates.

Brent Hayes


McCammon represents next generation of strong, intelligent women serving town

To the Editor:

Please join me and vote for my friend Jill McCammon. Jill and I have developed a very special, respectful friendship. She listens with an open mind; reflects on what she has heard; and follows up by asking difficult, thought-provoking, strategic questions.

The town was very fortunate to have Jill as the chairman of the High School Cafeteria Building Committee. The project hit many roadblocks. Jill updated the Board of Selectmen many times. Her presentations, which were professional, fact based and concise, reflected her competent, collaborative and calm leadership style.

As I reflect back on many of the conversations Jill and I have had, I smile. I realize she represents the next generation of strong, intelligent, kind, caring women that have stepped forward to serve the town. I think it is right to say, Jill McCammon is very similar to Susan Marks 20 years ago!

Susan Marks


What is the answer?

To the Editor:

My question… why do so few voters in Darien exercise their privilege to vote, especially in off-year elections? Is it because they think their vote won’t make a difference? Are they too busy to learn about the critical issues facing Darien? Or have they become complacent because they feel everything is running smoothly and trust our town’s leaders to keep up the good work?

I don’t have the answer. Recent studies confirm Darien is faring significantly better than other towns in Connecticut. This hasn’t happened by accident. It’s happened because we have exceptionally qualified and experienced Republican leaders watching our backs to ensure this town continues to remain a place where we want to live and raise our children.

I encourage Darien’s voters to go to the polls and support Darien’s proven leadership by voting for our First Selectman Jayme Stevenson, and her team of Republican candidates. Everyone’s vote counts!

Belinda B. Metzger


Martin will make a better Darien by serving as selectman

To the Editor:

I am writing to endorse David Martin’s candidacy for Darien’s Board of Selectmen. I have had the pleasure of serving with David on the RTM Finance & Budget Committee for the past three years and found him to be detail oriented, fact driven, terrific with numbers and spreadsheets, thoughtful and thorough and very easy to work with. In our deliberations, David has demonstrated that he always puts the interests of the Town and the taxpayers first. I believe he will work to support the best interests of all the residents of Darien in an inclusive and collaborative manner.

David has lived in town for over 20 years and is dedicated to preserving Darien’s reputation as a highly desired community and will work hard to minimize taxes while making the necessary investments to build a better Darien.

Please support David Martin for Board of Selectman on Nov. 5!

Lisa F. Yarnell

RTM Finance & Budget Committee, District 3 Chair

Bumgardner will work tirelessly on Board of Finance

To the Editor:

We are proud to support Dan Bumgardner for the Board of Finance. After more than 35 years in the financial services industry, he sincerely feels it is his turn to give back and serve Darien, the community he has called home since 1999.

We’ve known Dan and his wife Patti for 27 years and they are one of the main reasons we chose to move to Darien. Throughout his career Dan has always made time to be involved in the community, coaching softball, baseball and soccer and more recently working with the Darien Community Fund.

We have no doubt that Dan will work tirelessly to better our community for all. He is dedicated to Darien’s future and maintaining our town’s desirability for years to come.

We look forward to casting our vote for Dan Bumgardner in November.

Patty and Scott Debano