Motions to stay in Sandy Hook weapons case denied

A Superior Court judge denied motions made by gun companies to delay discovery in the trial presented by families of victims in the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting.

Judge Barbara Bellis denied the motions made by Remington Arms Company, Bushmaster Firearms, Camfour Holding and Riverview Gun Sales of East Winsdor to have discovery in the case stayed. The order means the companies being sued by the families of the Sandy Hook massacre must begin handing over internal documents and communications.

The gun companies had requested the stay until Bellis ruled on their motions to strike. But Bellis said in her ruling that a temporary stay might cause a delay in the trial, which is scheduled to begin on April 3, 2018.

“The court notes that while the motion to strike is scheduled for argument on June 20, 2016, a decision on the motion is not likely to be issued in less than 120 days in light of the complexity of the issues raised,” Bellis said. “Given the April 3, 2018 trial date, even a temporary stay of discovery through October of 2016 would translate into a delay of the trial, which the court is unwilling to consider given the fact that the case was filed in January of 2015. The motions to stay discovery are therefore denied.”

Josh Koskoff, an attorney representing the families, agreed with Bellis’ latest ruling.

“For almost a year and a half the families have waited patiently. They have waited and watched as the defendants tried every tactic to avoid having to disclose a single document or answer a single question under oath. Now that wait is officially over,” he said.

On April 14, Bellis rejected the gun companies’ motion to dismiss the case altogether. Five days later, she set the trial start date.

The families filed their lawsuit in January 2015, seeking damages after the Dec. 14, 2012 shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown. The victims, 20 children and six adults, were killed by Adam Lanza, who killed himself at Sandy Hook. Victoria Soto, a Stratford native and teacher at Sandy Hook, was one of the victims.

About author
Editor for the Stratford Star. Former reporter for the Darien Times.

By participating in the comments section of this site you are agreeing to our Privacy Policy and User Agreement

  • JNagarya

    Fingers crossed that at trial the families win.

    • Ohio9

      Why would you want that? Companies are not supposed to be held liable for criminal misuse of their products that are sold lawfully. They don’t have any control of what happens to their products after they are sold.

  • Fiftycal

    Ridiculous ruling. This whole suit will be struck down. This judge just wants to “punish” the gun companies. As to WHY the mother bought the AR-15, she isn’t around to answer. Her SON MURDERED HER and then took the gunz. How that is the fault of the gun maker requires the most twisted logic I’ve ever seen.

© HAN Network. All rights reserved. The Darien Times, 10 Corbin Drive, Floor 3, Darien, CT 06820

Designed by WPSHOWER

Powered by WordPress